From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Starlink Corn Products Liability Litigation

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
May 13, 2002
MDL No. 1403 No. 01 C 1181 (N.D. Ill. May. 13, 2002)

Opinion

MDL No. 1403 No. 01 C 1181

May 13, 2002


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


The Court of Appeals has directed that this court provide a statement of reasons for the denial of the motions to intervene. The motions to intervene were heard at the same time as the settlement fairness hearing. At the conclusion of that hearing I determined to reject the objections and to approve the settlement. I then denied the motions because the objectors had been fully heard and there were to be no further proceedings in the court. I perceived no purpose for intervention at that stage. While I concluded that the objections lacked any real substance, whether or not a denial of intervention might or would affect any right to appeal was not, so far as I can recall, considered by me.


Summaries of

In re Starlink Corn Products Liability Litigation

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
May 13, 2002
MDL No. 1403 No. 01 C 1181 (N.D. Ill. May. 13, 2002)
Case details for

In re Starlink Corn Products Liability Litigation

Case Details

Full title:IN RE STARLINK CORN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION KEITH FINGER, GLENITA…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division

Date published: May 13, 2002

Citations

MDL No. 1403 No. 01 C 1181 (N.D. Ill. May. 13, 2002)