From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Stanley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jun 15, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 4958 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

06-15-2017

TREMAIN LEE STANLEY, Respondent.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for petitioner. Tremain Lee Stanley, Summit, New Jersey, respondent pro se.


(Attorney Registration No. 3895976) Before: Peters, P.J., Garry, Clark, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for petitioner.

Tremain Lee Stanley, Summit, New Jersey, respondent pro se.

Per Curiam

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 2000 and lists a business address in Short Hills, New Jersey with the Office of Court Administration. This Court suspended respondent from the practice of law in New York in 2014 due to conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice arising from her failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) § 118.1 (113 AD3d 1020, 1053 [2014]; see Judiciary Law § 468-a [5]; Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rule 8.4 [d]). Respondent moves for her reinstatement (see Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16 [a]), and petitioner advises, by correspondence from its Chief Attorney, that it does not oppose the motion.

Respondent's application demonstrates that she has complied with the order of suspension and this Court's rules. Further, upon reading respondent's affidavit and the correspondence in response by petitioner's Chief Attorney, we are satisfied that respondent has the requisite character and fitness for the practice of law, and that it would be in the public's interest to reinstate her to practice in New York (see Uniform Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]). Accordingly, respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted, and she is reinstated to the practice of law in New York, effective immediately.

Peters, P.J., Garry, Clark, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the motion for reinstatement by respondent is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.


Summaries of

In re Stanley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jun 15, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 4958 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

In re Stanley

Case Details

Full title:TREMAIN LEE STANLEY, Respondent.

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 15, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 4958 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)