From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Stanley

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Jan 14, 2016
NO. 09-15-00482-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 14, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 09-15-00482-CV

01-14-2016

IN RE DAVID EARL STANLEY


Original Proceeding 258th District Court of Polk County, Texas
Trial Cause No. CIV 27223

MEMORANDUM OPINION

David Earl Stanley seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to rule on three motions filed by Stanley in an asset forfeiture case. Stanley complains that no action has been taken by the trial court on the motion to dismiss for want of prosecution that Stanley filed on September 13, 2015, the motion for summary judgment that Stanley filed on October 26, 2015, or the motion to supplement his motion for summary judgment that Stanley filed on November 5, 2015. The relator has not shown that the trial court delayed its disposition of his pre-trial motions for an unreasonable length of time. See In re Bates, 65 S.W.3d 133, 134-35 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding) (discussing factors to consider in evaluating whether the claims that the trial court failed to act within a reasonable time). We deny the petition.

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM Submitted on January 13, 2016
Opinion Delivered January 14, 2016 Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.


Summaries of

In re Stanley

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Jan 14, 2016
NO. 09-15-00482-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 14, 2016)
Case details for

In re Stanley

Case Details

Full title:IN RE DAVID EARL STANLEY

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Jan 14, 2016

Citations

NO. 09-15-00482-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 14, 2016)