From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Stanley

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 30, 2022
22-cv-04252-CRB (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-04252-CRB (PR)

08-30-2022

In re GERALD STANLEY, C80900, Plaintiff.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

CHARLES R. BREYER United States District Judge.

On July 22, 2022, the clerk filed as a new action a letter from plaintiff complaining about various conditions of his confinement at San Quentin State Prison (SQSP). The court notified plaintiff in writing at that time that the action was deficient because plaintiff did not file an actual complaint or pay the requisite $402.00 filing fee or, instead, submit a signed and completed court-approved in forma pauperis application, including a completed certificate of funds in the prisoner's account and a copy of the prisoner's trust account statement for the last six months. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Plaintiff was advised that failure to file the requested items within 28 days would result in dismissal of the action.

More than 28 days have elapsed; however, plaintiff has not provided the court with the requisite items or sought an extension of time to do so. The action accordingly is DISMISSED without prejudice.

The clerk shall close the file and terminate all pending deadlines and motions as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Stanley

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 30, 2022
22-cv-04252-CRB (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2022)
Case details for

In re Stanley

Case Details

Full title:In re GERALD STANLEY, C80900, Plaintiff.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 30, 2022

Citations

22-cv-04252-CRB (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2022)