Opinion
No. 05-17-00551-CV No. 05-17-00552-CV
08-14-2017
IN RE CHAD G. STANFORD, TED L. GLASSMAN, TURBINE ASSET HOLDINGS, LLC, TURBINE ASSET HOLDINGS GROUP, LLC AND JSS HOLDINGS GROUP, LLC, Relators
Original Proceeding from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. DC-16-07658 and DF-16-07714
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Schenck
Opinion by Justice Bridges
In this original proceeding, relators complain that the trial court denied their motion to consolidate two cases for trial. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relators' petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).
/David L. Bridges/
DAVID L. BRIDGES
JUSTICE 170551F.P05