From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Standard

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Dec 27, 2001
788 A.2d 154 (D.C. 2001)

Opinion

No. 00-BG-835

Submitted December 10, 2001

Decided December 27, 2001

On Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility (Bar Docket No. 135-00).

Before STEADMAN and GLICKMAN, Associate Judges, and BELSON, Senior Judge.


The Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that respondent Robert M. Standard be disbarred pursuant to D.C. Code 11-2503 (a) (2001), because he was convicted in the United States District Court for the Central District of California of bankruptcy fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 152. Neither Bar Counsel nor respondent has taken exception to the Board's report. Since bankruptcy fraud is a crime that inherently involves moral turpitude, disbarment is mandatory and we accept the Board's recommendation. See In re Sugarman, 677 A.2d 1049, 1050 (D.C. 1996) (per curiam). Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that Robert M. Standard is disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. As respondent has not filed the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, 14 (g), we.2 direct his attention to the requirements of that rule and their effect on his eligibility for reinstatement. See D.C. Bar XI, 16 (c).

So ordered.


Summaries of

In re Standard

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Dec 27, 2001
788 A.2d 154 (D.C. 2001)
Case details for

In re Standard

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ROBERT M. STANDARD, RESPONDENT. A Member of the Bar of the District…

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 27, 2001

Citations

788 A.2d 154 (D.C. 2001)

Citing Cases

In re Shmuckler

Since bankruptcy fraud is a crime that inherently involves moral turpitude, disbarment is mandatory, and we…