From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Stancil

Supreme Court of Florida
May 31, 1984
451 So. 2d 480 (Fla. 1984)

Opinion

No. 63885.

May 31, 1984.

Original Proceeding — Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission.

Mark Hulsey, Chairman, Jacksonville, and John S. Rawls, Gen. Counsel, Tallahassee, for the Fla. Judicial Qualifications Com'n.

William G. O'Neill of O'Neill, Cornelius Cohen, Ocala, for Hale R. Stancil.


The Judicial Qualifications Commission initiated this proceeding accusing County Judge Hale R. Stancil of a violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The Commission filed with this Court its finding of a violation and a recommendation of a public reprimand. We issued an order to Judge Stancil to show cause why the recommendation should not be followed. He filed his response to the order to show cause. Now the Commission has filed a reply to Judge Stancil's response, withdrawing its previous recommendation of a public reprimand.

The Commission having withdrawn its recommendation of a public reprimand, we find, based on the lack of clear and convincing evidence, that Judge Stancil is not guilty of the charged violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct.

This proceeding on judicial conduct is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ALDERMAN, C.J., and BOYD, OVERTON, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Stancil

Supreme Court of Florida
May 31, 1984
451 So. 2d 480 (Fla. 1984)
Case details for

In re Stancil

Case Details

Full title:IN RE INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE HALE R. STANCIL

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 31, 1984

Citations

451 So. 2d 480 (Fla. 1984)