From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re St. Farm Mutual Auto. v. Torcivia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 2000
277 A.D.2d 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted October 11, 2000.

November 13, 2000.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the appeals are from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), entered February 2, 2000, which granted the petition and permanently stayed arbitration, and (2) an order of the same court, dated May 3, 2000, which denied reargument.

Harold Chetrick, P.C., New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Martin, Fallon Mullé, Huntington, N.Y. (Richard C. Mullé of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, HOWARD MILLER, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal from the order dated May 3, 2000, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

ORDERED that order entered February 2, 2000, is affirmed; and it is further,

ORDERED that the petitioner is awarded one bill of costs.

The appellant, Glen J. Torcivia, was involved in a motor vehicle accident in New York when the vehicle he was driving was struck in the rear by another vehicle, which then left the scene. Torcivia was insured by the petitioner under a policy issued in South Carolina, and his vehicle had South Carolina plates. Torcivia served the petitioner with a demand for arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim. The petitioner commenced this proceeding to permanently stay arbitration on the ground that the policy did not contain a provision for the arbitration of uninsured motorist claims.

The Supreme Court properly granted the petition and permanently stayed arbitration. A party will not be compelled to arbitrate, and thus surrender the right to litigate a dispute in court, absent evidence which affirmatively establishes that the parties expressly agreed to arbitrate their disputes (see, Matter of Waldron [Goddess], 61 N.Y.2d 181; Schubtex, Inc. v. Allen Snyder, Inc., 49 N.Y.2d 1). In addition, an agreement to arbitrate must be "express, direct, and unequivocal as to the issues or disputes to be submitted to arbitration" (Gangel v. DeGroot, 41 N.Y.2d 840, 841). Since Torcivia concedes that the policy at issue did not provide for the arbitration of uninsured motorist claims, the petitioner cannot be compelled to arbitrate.

Contrary to Torcivia's contention, there is no requirement under the New York no-fault statutes and regulations that mandates arbitration where, as here, a policy issued out of state meets the minimum financial security requirements of Insurance Law § 5107 (cf., Matter of Midwest Mut. Ins. Co. v. Pisani, 250 A.D.2d 51 2; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. [Ramos], 234 A.D.2d 41).


Summaries of

In re St. Farm Mutual Auto. v. Torcivia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 2000
277 A.D.2d 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

In re St. Farm Mutual Auto. v. Torcivia

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 13, 2000

Citations

277 A.D.2d 321 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
715 N.Y.S.2d 75

Citing Cases

Salzman v. Electric Ins. Co.

Here, it is clear that the subject automobile insurance policy issued by Electric Insurance Company to the…

Inc. Vill. of Rockville Ctr. v. Ziegler

The Supreme Court, inter alia, denied that branch of the petition which was to permanently stay arbitration.…