In re S.S.

4 Citing cases

  1. In re J.K.S.-L.

    2024 MT 150 (Mont. 2024)

    ¶17 This Court "review[s] a district court's findings of fact to determine if they are clearly erroneous." In re S.S., 2022 MT 75, ¶ 12, 408 Mont. 238, 507 P.3d 1161 (citing In re J.S., 2014 MT 79, ¶ 14, 374 Mont. 329, 321 P.3d 103). "A finding of fact is clearly erroneous if it is not supported by substantial evidence, if the district court misapprehended the effect of the evidence, or if this Court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." In re S.S., ¶ 12 (citing In re J.S., ¶ 14).

  2. In re M.Z.L.

    2023 MT 192 (Mont. 2023)

    "A finding of fact is clearly erroneous if it is not supported by substantial evidence, if the district court misapprehended the effect of the evidence, or if this Court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." In re S.S., 2022 MT 75, ¶ 12, 408 Mont. 238, 507 P.3d 1161.

  3. In re L.E.A.B.

    2023 MT 169 (Mont. 2023)

    We review the district court's findings of fact for clear error. In re S.S., 2022 MT 75, ¶ 12, 408 Mont. 238, 507 P.3d 1161. "A finding of fact is clearly erroneous if it is not supported by substantial evidence, if the district court misapprehended the effect of the evidence, or if this Court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed."

  4. In re P.C.

    2023 MT 46 (Mont. 2023)

    We review a district court's findings of fact for clear error, which consists of a lack of supporting substantial evidence, a misapprehension by the district court of the effect of the evidence, or a "definite and firm conviction" on appeal that a mistake has been made. In re S.S., 2022 MT 75, ¶ 12, 408 Mont. 238, 507 P.3d 1161.