From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re S.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 27, 1996
683 So. 2d 576 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Summary

holding that, where the department recommends community control for a juvenile, the trial court is required to receive and consider a further restrictiveness-level recommendation before ordering the juvenile's commitment

Summary of this case from A.R. v. State

Opinion

No. 96-943.

November 7, 1996. Rehearing Denied December 27, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, Aaron Bowden, J.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Giselle Lylen Rivera, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


A juvenile court found appellant guilty of battery on a law enforcement officer and of resisting an officer with violence. The Department of Juvenile Justice filed a predisposition report recommending that appellant be placed on community control. The trial court rejected the Department's recommendation and, without receiving a further recommendation as to a restrictiveness level, imposed a moderate risk (level 6) commitment. We reverse and remand because section 39.052(4)(e)2., Florida Statutes, unequivocally requires the court to receive and consider a recommendation from the Department as to restrictiveness level before ordering a commitment.

MINER, ALLEN and MICKLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re S.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 27, 1996
683 So. 2d 576 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

holding that, where the department recommends community control for a juvenile, the trial court is required to receive and consider a further restrictiveness-level recommendation before ordering the juvenile's commitment

Summary of this case from A.R. v. State

In S.R. v. State, 683 So.2d 576 (Fla. 1st DCA November 7, 1996), we held that "section 39.052(4)(e)2, Florida Statutes, unequivocally requires the court to receive and consider a recommendation from the Department as to restrictiveness level before ordering a commitment."

Summary of this case from J. P. M. v. State
Case details for

In re S.R. v. State

Case Details

Full title:In the Interest of S.R., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 27, 1996

Citations

683 So. 2d 576 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

State v. E.D.P

The district court reasoned in L.R.J. v. State that "community control is not a `restrictiveness level' and…

State v. J.P.C

In accordance with our decisions inD.L.B. and E.D.P., we quashJ.P.C. We disapprove of the precedents upon…