From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Williams

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 21, 2016
138 A.D.3d 1345 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

Attorney Registration No. 3064094

04-21-2016

In the Matter of DERRICK R. WILLIAMS SR., a Suspended Attorney. COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS, Petitioner; DERRICK R. WILLIAMS SR., Respondent.

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Michael K. Creaser of counsel), for petitioner. Derrick R. Williams Sr., St. Ann, Missouri, respondent pro se.


Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose, Devine and Aarons, JJ.

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Michael K. Creaser of counsel), for petitioner.

Derrick R. Williams Sr., St. Ann, Missouri, respondent pro se.

Per Curiam

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 2000. In 2001, respondent was admitted to practice in Missouri, where he currently resides.

By order entered June 19, 2008, this Court suspended respondent for one year based upon his January 2008 suspension in Missouri (52 AD3d 1112 [2008]). Thereafter, by order entered May 5, 2011, this Court denied respondent's application for reinstatement, concluding that he had yet to remedy the issues that led to his suspension in Missouri (84 AD3d 1499 [2011]). Respondent was reinstated to the practice of law in Missouri in August 2015. Now, by application sworn to on September 26, 2015, respondent has reapplied for reinstatement to the practice of law in this state. Following an investigation, petitioner advises that it opposes respondent's application.

Upon review of the submissions and consideration of all the circumstances in the record before us, we conclude that respondent has not shown by clear and convincing evidence that he possesses the character and general fitness to resume the practice of law (see Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.12 [b]). Accordingly, we deny his current application for reinstatement.

Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose, Devine and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application for reinstatement is denied.


Summaries of

In re Williams

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 21, 2016
138 A.D.3d 1345 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

In re Williams

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DERRICK R. WILLIAMS SR., a Suspended Attorney. COMMITTEE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 21, 2016

Citations

138 A.D.3d 1345 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 3059
28 N.Y.S.3d 645

Citing Cases

Comm. on Prof'l Standards v. Williams (In re Williams)

In 2001, respondent was admitted to practice in Missouri, where he currently resides.By order entered June…

In re Williams

In 2001, respondent was admitted to practice in Missouri, where he currently resides.By order entered June…