From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Spiegler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 29, 2008
51 A.D.3d 1349 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 503566.

May 29, 2008.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 3, 2007, which, among other things, charged claimant with a recoverable overpayment of unemployment insurance benefits.

Brenda J. Spiegler, Rosedale, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York City (Dawn A. Foshee of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Kane and Stein, JJ.


The sole issue presented by claimant on this appeal is whether she was properly charged by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board with a recoverable overpayment of unemployment insurance benefits. The record reveals that claimant, a registered nurse who failed a certain competency exam, was previously determined to have voluntarily left her employment without good cause because her employment ended after she declined to pursue an opportunity for a transfer to a position in which she would not be required to pass the exam. Inasmuch as claimant reported on her ensuing application for benefits that she had been fired, substantial evidence supports the Board's finding of a recoverable overpayment, notwithstanding claimant's contention that the misrepresentation was not willful ( see Labor Law § 597; Matter of McBurney [Commissioner of Labor], 46 AD3d 1308).

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Spiegler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 29, 2008
51 A.D.3d 1349 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

In re Spiegler

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of BRENDA J. SPIEGLER, Appellant. COMMISSIONER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 29, 2008

Citations

51 A.D.3d 1349 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 4806
857 N.Y.S.2d 514