From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Soto

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Sep 10, 2009
978 A.2d 913 (N.J. 2009)

Opinion

September 10, 2009.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 08-410, concluding that FRANKLIN G. SOTO of PATERSON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with client), RPC 1.5(c) (failure to provide written fee agreement), and RPC 1.7(a) (conflict of interest), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that FRANKLIN G. SOTO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Soto

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Sep 10, 2009
978 A.2d 913 (N.J. 2009)
Case details for

In re Soto

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF FRANKLIN G. SOTO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Sep 10, 2009

Citations

978 A.2d 913 (N.J. 2009)
978 A.2d 913

Citing Cases

In re Seymour

See, e.g., In re Soto, 200 N.J. 216 (2009) (reprimand imposed on attorney who represented the driver and…

In re Pocaro

See, e.g., In re Soto, 200 N.J. 216 (2009) (attorney represented the driver and the passenger in a personal…