From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sorokina v. Fernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 28, 2000
278 A.D.2d 164 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

December 28, 2000.

Order, Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.), entered on or about December 23, 1999, which denied respondent's objections to the order of the Hearing Examiner, entered on or about August 30, 1999, which denied respondent's application to vacate an order of the Hearing Examiner, entered on or about July 21, 1999, on respondent's default, confirming the registration of an order of support entered in Family Court in Ontario, Canada, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Russell Bogart, for petitioner-respondent.

Edwin I. Gorski, for respondent-appellant.

Before: Rosenberger, J.P., Williams, Wallach, Saxe, Buckley, JJ.


Although offered the opportunity to demonstrate a meritorious defense to registration of the Canadian order of support, respondent failed to do so, despite the passage of two months. Moreover, his failure timely to appear in court on the scheduled day warranted denial of vacatur of his default (see, Matter of Heck v. Heck, 248 A.D.2d 885).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In re Sorokina v. Fernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 28, 2000
278 A.D.2d 164 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

In re Sorokina v. Fernandez

Case Details

Full title:In re Proceeding for Out-of-State Support, etc., Alissa Sorokina…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 28, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 164 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
719 N.Y.S.2d 11