From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Solheim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 2009
68 A.D.3d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2009-07117.

December 15, 2009.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the respondents from enforcing an order of the respondent Gary J. Weber, a Judge of the County Court, Suffolk County, dated July 7, 2009, which granted the motion of the respondent Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney of Suffolk County, to compel the petitioner to provide a buccal swab sample for DNA analysis in connection with a homicide investigation.

Hartmann Doherty Rosa Berman Bulbulia, LLC, New York, N.Y. (Mark A. Berman of counsel), for petitioner.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Fisher, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.


Adjudged that the petition is denied, the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements, and the temporary stay contained in the order to show cause dated August 5, 2009 is vacated forthwith.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" ( Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569; see Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought ( see Matter of Thompson v Griffin, 58 AD3d 637; Matter of Weissman v Lange, 4 AD3d 478; see also Matter of Traynor v Rosato, 275 AD2d 326).


Summaries of

In re Solheim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 2009
68 A.D.3d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

In re Solheim

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of THOMAS SOLHEIM, Petitioner, v. GARY J. WEBER, as Judge of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 15, 2009

Citations

68 A.D.3d 1002 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 9476
889 N.Y.S.2d 867

Citing Cases

Miller v. Foley

t relevant material evidence will be found, and (3) the method used to secure it is safe and reliable' "…

Edwards v. Derosa

establish (1) probable cause to believe the suspect has committed the crime, (2) a ‘clear indication’ that…