From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Snow

Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler
Jun 30, 2010
Nos. 12-10-00132-CR, 12-10-00133-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 30, 2010)

Opinion

Nos. 12-10-00132-CR, 12-10-00133-CR

Opinion delivered June 30, 2010. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Original Proceeding.

Panel consisted of WORTHEN, C.J., GRIFFITH, J., and HOYLE, J.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Kenneth Leon Snow seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the trial court to withdraw his guilty plea in two cases, vacate his sentences, and return him to the position he occupied prior to entering his guilty pleas. We deny the petition. In 1998, Snow was convicted of robbery (trial court cause number 241-90487-97) and aggravated robbery (trial court cause number 241-80726-97) after pleading guilty to both offenses. He was granted deferred adjudication probation in both cases pursuant to a plea bargain. His deferred adjudication probation was subsequently revoked, and he is presently serving a term of imprisonment that was assessed upon revocation. Snow asserts that, because he was convicted of aggravated robbery, he was ineligible for deferred adjudication probation. He reasons that because of this ineligibility, the trial court's grant of deferred adjudication probation was void, as was the court's subsequent revocation and assessment of a term of imprisonment. Therefore, he concludes, his guilty pleas were involuntary and he is entitled to withdraw them and be returned to the position he occupied before entering the pleas. In a criminal case, mandamus is appropriate when (1) the relator has no adequate remedy at law and (2) the act sought to be compelled is ministerial rather than discretionary. Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). A defendant may obtain relief from an illegal sentence on direct appeal or by a writ of habeas corpus. Mizell v. State, 119 S.W.3d 804, 806 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). Although Snow's time for filing a notice of appeal has expired, see TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2, he may seek relief by filing a postconviction writ of habeas corpus. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. § 11.07 (Vernon 2005). Therefore, Snow has an adequate remedy at law. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.


Summaries of

In re Snow

Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler
Jun 30, 2010
Nos. 12-10-00132-CR, 12-10-00133-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 30, 2010)
Case details for

In re Snow

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: KENNETH LEON SNOW, RELATOR

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler

Date published: Jun 30, 2010

Citations

Nos. 12-10-00132-CR, 12-10-00133-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 30, 2010)