In re S.N.A. Nut Co.

1 Citing case

  1. In re S.N.A. Nut Co.

    247 B.R. 7 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2000)   Cited 6 times
    Holding that under the UCC contracts may be made in any manner sufficient to show agreement

    Partial summary judgment was also entered in SNA's favor on several of HD's affirmative defenses. On November 20, 1998, summary judgment was entered in SNA's favor on four of HD's affirmative defenses: (1) statute of frauds (First Affirmative Defense); (2) judicial estoppel (Fourth Affirmative Defense); (3) equitable estoppel (Fifth Affirmative Defense); (4) res judicata (Eighth Affirmative Defense). S.N.A. Nut Co. v. Haagen-Dazs Co., Inc. (In re S.N.A. Nut Co.), 226 B.R. 869, 878 (Bankr. N.D.Ill. 1998). On March 29, 1999, summary judgment was entered in SNA's favor on HD's Thirteenth Affirmative Defense. S.N.A. Nut Co. v. Haagen-Dazs Co., Inc. (In re S.N.A. Nut Co.), 231 B.R. 12, 14 (Bankr.N.D.Ill. 1999).