In re S.N.A. Nut Co.

2 Citing cases

  1. In re Wedlo Holdings, Inc.

    Bankruptcy Nos. 96 B 2698, 96 B 2701, 96 B 2702 (Jointly Administered), Chapter 11 Cases; Adversary No. 96 A 01025 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. May. 16, 2000)

    In deciding a summary judgment motion, the court should not "weigh the evidence." S.N.A. Nut Co. v. The Haagen-Dazs Co., Inc. (In re S.N.A. Nut Co.), 226 B.R. 869, 871 (Bankr.N.D.Ill. 1998) (citations omitted). Because each party has presented some evidence regarding the financing statement, and this Court, on a motion for summary judgment, cannot weigh the evidence, summary judgment is not appropriate on the issue of whether Schick filed a UCC-1 financing statement with respect to Wedlo's inventory.

  2. In re Wedlo Holdings, Inc.

    248 B.R. 336 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2000)   Cited 5 times
    Holding as a matter of law that consignee who obtained only 15% to 20% of its inventory on consignment was not substantially engaged in selling goods of others

    In deciding a summary judgment motion, the court should not "weigh the evidence." S.N.A. Nut Co. v. Haagen-Dazs Co., Inc. (In re S.N.A. Nut Co.), 226 B.R. 869, 871 (Bankr.N.D.Ill. 1998) (citations omitted). Because each party has presented some evidence regarding the financing statement, and this Court, on a motion for summary judgment, cannot weigh the evidence, summary judgment is not appropriate on the issue of whether Schick filed a UCC-1 financing statement with respect to Wedlo's inventory.