From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Smithback

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Jun 16, 2016
NO. 09-16-00184-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 16, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 09-16-00184-CV

06-16-2016

IN RE ROBERT NORMAN SMITHBACK


Original Proceeding 411th District Court of Polk County, Texas
Trial Cause No. CIV29146

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Robert Norman Smithback, filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, in which he contends the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing relator's case for failing to comply with Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that may be issued to correct a clear abuse of discretion when that abuse cannot be remedied by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840-44 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the mandamus record and petition, we conclude that the relator has not demonstrated that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Relator has not shown that the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing his lawsuit and that he has no adequate remedy by appeal. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM Submitted on June 15, 2016
Opinion Delivered June 16, 2016 Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.


Summaries of

In re Smithback

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Jun 16, 2016
NO. 09-16-00184-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 16, 2016)
Case details for

In re Smithback

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ROBERT NORMAN SMITHBACK

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Jun 16, 2016

Citations

NO. 09-16-00184-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 16, 2016)