From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Smith

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Sep 13, 2006
No. WR-63,694-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 13, 2006)

Opinion

No. WR-63,694-01

Filed: September 13, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Application for writ of mandamus. Appeal from the Fifth Court of Appeals, Kaufman County.


CONCURRING STATEMENT


Relator contends that the court of appeals refused to appoint counsel, even though he was allegedly abandoned by appointed counsel. No briefs were filed in the court of appeals. The record reflects that the court of appeals affirmed Relator's conviction for possession of a controlled substance on September 26, 2005. Mandamus will issue to compel a purely ministerial duty when relator has no other adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Rosenthal v. Poe, 98 S.W.3d 194 (Tex.Crim.App. 2003). I join the Court's denial to grant leave to file for mandamus relief because Relator has an adequate remedy at law; he may file a writ of habeas corpus requesting an out-of-time appeal.


Summaries of

In re Smith

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Sep 13, 2006
No. WR-63,694-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 13, 2006)
Case details for

In re Smith

Case Details

Full title:HENRY LAURIE SMITH, III, Relator

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Sep 13, 2006

Citations

No. WR-63,694-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Sep. 13, 2006)