From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Smith

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jan 11, 2018
231 N.J. 397 (N.J. 2018)

Opinion

D–188 September Term 2016 079711

01-11-2018

In the MATTER OF Keith T. SMITH, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 024721989)


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 17–007, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20–4(f) (default by respondent) that KEITH T. SMITH of EGG HARBOR TOWNSHIP , who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, should be censured for violating RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21–6 (recordkeeping); and RPC 8.1(b) and Rule 1:20–3(g)(3); and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that KEITH T. SMITH is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Smith

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jan 11, 2018
231 N.J. 397 (N.J. 2018)
Case details for

In re Smith

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF Keith T. SMITH, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jan 11, 2018

Citations

231 N.J. 397 (N.J. 2018)
231 N.J. 397

Citing Cases

In re Smith

On January 11, 2018, respondent was censured for recordkeeping violations (RPC 1.15(d) and R. 1:21-6) and…

In re Smith

On January 11, 2018, the Court imposed a censure on respondent, in a default matter, for his failure to…