From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Smith

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
May 9, 2014
No. 10-14-00133-CV (Tex. App. May. 9, 2014)

Opinion

No. 10-14-00133-CV

05-09-2014

IN RE TERRY JUSTIN SMITH


Original Proceeding


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Because a protective order is a final, appealable order, relator had an adequate remedy by appeal even if that remedy is no longer available. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 81.009 (West 2014); In re Tex. Dep't of Family & Protective Servs., 210 S.W.3d 609, 614 (Tex. 2006); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex. 1992).

Smith filed a motion for new trial but we express no opinion about whether the time in which to file a notice of appeal, or a motion to extend the filing thereof, has expired.

Accordingly relator's Petition for writ of Mandamus is denied.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins
Petition denied
[OT06]


Summaries of

In re Smith

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
May 9, 2014
No. 10-14-00133-CV (Tex. App. May. 9, 2014)
Case details for

In re Smith

Case Details

Full title:IN RE TERRY JUSTIN SMITH

Court:TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: May 9, 2014

Citations

No. 10-14-00133-CV (Tex. App. May. 9, 2014)