BOYD, Justice. This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, reported at 291 So.2d 43. Conflict has been alleged between the decision sought to be reviewed and Graham v. State and Hall v. State Department of Public Welfare. The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties.
The latter order prohibited certain actions by petitioner which were, in effect, declared violative of a prior June 22, 1981, order determining dependency of a child, M.E.M., and ordering her to have no contact with petitioner. Petitioner's reliance upon the reasoning of In re. S.M.G., 291 So.2d 43 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974), is misplaced because of our conclusion that the August 26 order directed to petitioner is limited to conduct reasonably regarded as "interfering with . . . or violating [the June 22nd] order of the court." ยง 39.412, Florida Statutes.