Opinion
A22-1688
02-20-2024
In the Matter of the SIRS Appeal by Best Care, LLC
ORDER ON PETITION FOR FURTHER REVIEW;
Issue Granted:
In order to recover public funds paid to a vendor of medical care, is the Minnesota Department of Human Services required to prove both that the vendor committed abuse of a Medical Assistance program, and separately that such abuse also caused the vendor to be improperly paid for services that were not actually provided?; Cross-Review Issue Granted: Did the court of appeals correctly conclude that Relator was required to maintain copies of PCA Choice care plans in their offices and that the failure to do so constitutes abuse?
Lift Stay/Proceed with Briefing