From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sinquefield

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 9, 2012
568 U.S. 940 (2012)

Opinion

No. 12–5555.

10-09-2012

In re David Eugene SINQUEFIELD, petitioner.


Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).


Summaries of

In re Sinquefield

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 9, 2012
568 U.S. 940 (2012)
Case details for

In re Sinquefield

Case Details

Full title:In re David Eugene SINQUEFIELD, petitioner.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Oct 9, 2012

Citations

568 U.S. 940 (2012)
568 U.S. 940
184 L. Ed. 2d 291
81 U.S.L.W. 3195