From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Singhal

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Sep 14, 2021
No. 2020-2318 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 14, 2021)

Opinion

2020-2318

09-14-2021

IN RE: TARA CHAND SINGHAL, Appellant

WALTER D. DAVIS, JR., Davidson Berquist Jackson &Gowdey, LLP, McLean, VA, argued for appellant Tara Chand Singhal. KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrew Hirshfeld. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/928, 710.

WALTER D. DAVIS, JR., Davidson Berquist Jackson &Gowdey, LLP, McLean, VA, argued for appellant Tara Chand Singhal.

KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrew Hirshfeld. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM

NEWMAN, O'MALLEY, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

In re Singhal

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Sep 14, 2021
No. 2020-2318 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 14, 2021)
Case details for

In re Singhal

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: TARA CHAND SINGHAL, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Sep 14, 2021

Citations

No. 2020-2318 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 14, 2021)