From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Silverman

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Apr 19, 1926
11 F.2d 970 (2d Cir. 1926)

Opinion

No. 201.

April 19, 1926.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

In the matter of Anna Silverman, bankrupt. From an order punishing Alexander M. Zack for not obeying a previous order, he appeals. Affirmed.

Archibald Palmer, of New York City (Max L. Rosenstein, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Charles Soble, of New York City, for appellee.

Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.


This appeal is taken from an order punishing one Zack for not obeying another order made many months earlier. Zack appeared and in substance pleaded only that the court never had authority to enter the order that he had not obeyed. But the point had been ruled against him months before, he had taken an appeal, the appeal had been dismissed, and the point had become an adjudicated thing. This appellant can no longer raise the point of lack of jurisdiction to make the original order, and we are precluded from considering it.

The order is modified, by striking out the provision for interest and substituting a direction that Zack pay over the principal sum and whatever he has earned with it or by it. As modified, the order is affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

In re Silverman

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Apr 19, 1926
11 F.2d 970 (2d Cir. 1926)
Case details for

In re Silverman

Case Details

Full title:In re SILVERMAN

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Apr 19, 1926

Citations

11 F.2d 970 (2d Cir. 1926)

Citing Cases

SEATTLE CURB EXCHANGE v. KNIGHT

Whether or not the order should require the payment of interest in case the money is held subject to the…

In re Reiss

The bankrupt has appeared in opposition to this motion, and affidavits have been filed on his behalf, by…