From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sightline Search, Inc.

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Oct 22, 2019
No. 05-19-00998-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 22, 2019)

Opinion

No. 05-19-00998-CV

10-22-2019

IN RE SIGHTLINE SEARCH, INC., JOHN C. EDWARDS, AND ANTOINETTE H. EDWARDS, Relators


Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-16090

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Nowell
Opinion by Justice Molberg

On August 22, 2019 relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion to stay, challenging the trial court's July 31, 2019 order granting real parties in interest's motion to conduct discovery related to real parties' amended motion to dismiss under the Texas Citizen's Participation Act. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 27.001-.011. On August 28, 2019, relators requested we take no action on the matter until they submitted an update to the Court. The following day, relators advised by letter that the parties were seeking mediation.

The Court now has before it relators' October 11, 2019 unopposed motion to dismiss with prejudice their petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion to stay. In the motion to dismiss, relators advise that the parties have reached a settlement in the underlying dispute. Accordingly, we grant relators' unopposed motion and dismiss with prejudice the petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion to stay TCPA discovery order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1.

/Ken Molberg//

KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE 190998f.p05


Summaries of

In re Sightline Search, Inc.

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Oct 22, 2019
No. 05-19-00998-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 22, 2019)
Case details for

In re Sightline Search, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE SIGHTLINE SEARCH, INC., JOHN C. EDWARDS, AND ANTOINETTE H. EDWARDS…

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Oct 22, 2019

Citations

No. 05-19-00998-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 22, 2019)