Opinion
22-1475
06-08-2022
In re: ANTONIO SHROPSHIRE, a/k/a Brill, a/k/a B, a/k/a Tony, Petitioner.
Antonio Shropshire, Petitioner Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: May 27, 2022
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:16-cr-00051-CCB-3)
Antonio Shropshire, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Antonio Shropshire petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that on May 9, 2022, the district court denied relief on Shropshire's motion. United States v. Shropshire, No. 1:16-cr-00051-CCB-3 (D. Md. May 9, 2022). Accordingly, because the district court has rendered its decision on Shropshire's § 2255 motion, we deny his mandamus petition as moot. See Incumaa v. Ozmint, 507 F.3d 281, 286 (4th Cir. 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.