Opinion
21-1828
09-13-2021
In re: ANTONIO SHROPSHIRE, a/k/a Brill, a/k/a B, a/k/a Tony, Petitioner.
Antonio Shropshire, Petitioner Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: September 9, 2021
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:16-cr-00051-CCB-3; 1:21-cv-00202-CCB)
Antonio Shropshire, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Antonio Shropshire petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion for an expedited hearing on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court recently took significant action on Shropshire's motion by ordering a response from the Government. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.