From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Shropshire

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 13, 2021
No. 21-1828 (4th Cir. Sep. 13, 2021)

Opinion

21-1828

09-13-2021

In re: ANTONIO SHROPSHIRE, a/k/a Brill, a/k/a B, a/k/a Tony, Petitioner.

Antonio Shropshire, Petitioner Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: September 9, 2021

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:16-cr-00051-CCB-3; 1:21-cv-00202-CCB)

Antonio Shropshire, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM.

Antonio Shropshire petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion for an expedited hearing on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court recently took significant action on Shropshire's motion by ordering a response from the Government. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.


Summaries of

In re Shropshire

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 13, 2021
No. 21-1828 (4th Cir. Sep. 13, 2021)
Case details for

In re Shropshire

Case Details

Full title:In re: ANTONIO SHROPSHIRE, a/k/a Brill, a/k/a B, a/k/a Tony, Petitioner.

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 13, 2021

Citations

No. 21-1828 (4th Cir. Sep. 13, 2021)