From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Shore

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 11, 2016
2016-1182 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2016)

Opinion

2016-1182

10-11-2016

IN RE: MICHAEL WAYNE SHORE, STUART DOUGLAS DWORK, Appellants

JOHN DAVID SIMMONS, Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP, Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellants. Also represented by DENNIS JAMES BUTLER, Wilmington, DE; MICHAEL W. SHORE, Shore Chan DePumpo LLP, Dallas, TX. COKE MORGAN STEWART, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MICHAEL SUMNER FORMAN, LORA DRISCOLL.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/402,996.

JUDGMENT

JOHN DAVID SIMMONS, Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP, Philadelphia, PA, argued for appellants. Also represented by DENNIS JAMES BUTLER, Wilmington, DE; MICHAEL W. SHORE, Shore Chan DePumpo LLP, Dallas, TX. COKE MORGAN STEWART, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MICHAEL SUMNER FORMAN, LORA DRISCOLL. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 11, 2016

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Shore

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 11, 2016
2016-1182 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2016)
Case details for

In re Shore

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: MICHAEL WAYNE SHORE, STUART DOUGLAS DWORK, Appellants

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 11, 2016

Citations

2016-1182 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2016)