From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Shilling

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Aug 28, 2017
No. 05-17-00833-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 28, 2017)

Opinion

No. 05-17-00833-CV

08-28-2017

IN RE KATHRYN L. SHILLING, Relator


Original Proceeding from County Court at Law No. 7 Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 007-01659-2016

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang, and Justice Stoddart
Opinion by Justice Stoddart

Before the Court is relator's July 14, 2017 petition for writ of mandamus and real party in interest's August 21, 2017 response. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown she is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus.

/Craig Stoddart/

CRAIG STODDART

JUSTICE 170833F.P05


Summaries of

In re Shilling

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Aug 28, 2017
No. 05-17-00833-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 28, 2017)
Case details for

In re Shilling

Case Details

Full title:IN RE KATHRYN L. SHILLING, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Aug 28, 2017

Citations

No. 05-17-00833-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 28, 2017)