From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sherrod

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 20, 2017
No. 17-1837 (4th Cir. Nov. 20, 2017)

Opinion

No. 17-1837

11-20-2017

In re: MARION LAMONT SHERROD, Petitioner.

Marion L. Sherrod, Petitioner Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:12-cv-00048-RJC) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marion L. Sherrod, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Marion Lamont Sherrod petitions for a writ of mandamus, complaining generally about the delay in resolving a case now pending in district court and in his pro se status for that case. The district court has scheduled Sherrod's case for trail and Sherrod is now represented by counsel. Accordingly, Sherrod is entitled to no mandamus relief. See In re Roddy, 810 F.3d 286, 287 (4th Cir. 2016) (holding that mandamus "relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances"). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Sherrod

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 20, 2017
No. 17-1837 (4th Cir. Nov. 20, 2017)
Case details for

In re Sherrod

Case Details

Full title:In re: MARION LAMONT SHERROD, Petitioner.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 20, 2017

Citations

No. 17-1837 (4th Cir. Nov. 20, 2017)