From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sherrill

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Sep 17, 2013
NO. 01-13-00605-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 17, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 01-13-00605-CR

2013-09-17

IN RE STEVEN MICHAEL SHERRILL, Relator


Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On July 15, 2013, the relator, Steven Michael Sherrill, filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, requesting that we direct the trial court to provide him with, or respond to his request for, a free transcript of his trial proceedings.

The underlying case is State v. Sherrill, No. 1068120, in the 263rd District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Jim Wallace presiding. We previously affirmed Sherrill's conviction in this cause in Sherill v. State, No. 01-07-00503-CR, 2008 WL 4670606 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, pet ref'd) (mem. op., not designated for publication). Because Sherill is entitled to a free copy of his transcript only for his initial appeal and Sherrill has exhausted that appeal, he is not entitled to another free transcript. See Ex parte Trainer, 181 S.W.3d 358 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Escobar v. State, 880 S.W.2d 782, 783 (Tex. App — Houston 1st Dist. 1993, no pet.).

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Bland. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

In re Sherrill

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Sep 17, 2013
NO. 01-13-00605-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 17, 2013)
Case details for

In re Sherrill

Case Details

Full title:IN RE STEVEN MICHAEL SHERRILL, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Sep 17, 2013

Citations

NO. 01-13-00605-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 17, 2013)

Citing Cases

Yepez v. State

But an indigent petitioner is not entitled to a free copy of the record for purposes of seeking discretionary…

Miller v. State

But an indigent petitioner is not entitled to a free copy of the record for purposes of seeking discretionary…