From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shell v. Rackley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 21, 2017
CASE NO. 16cv2320-LAB (JLB) (S.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 16cv2320-LAB (JLB)

08-21-2017

EDWARD V. SHELL, Petitioner, v. RONALD RACKLEY, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court finds Judge Burkhardt's Report and Recommendation correct and adopts it. Edward Shell failed to file timely objections, but the Court considered the issues he raised in his extension motion [Dkt. 20] and finds them meritless. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Shell's motion to expand the record and his petition for habeas relief is denied. [Dkt. 15 & 16]. Since Shell hasn't "made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right," the Court denies him a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253. The clerk shall enter judgment and close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 21, 2017

/s/_________

HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Shell v. Rackley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 21, 2017
CASE NO. 16cv2320-LAB (JLB) (S.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2017)
Case details for

Shell v. Rackley

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD V. SHELL, Petitioner, v. RONALD RACKLEY, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 21, 2017

Citations

CASE NO. 16cv2320-LAB (JLB) (S.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2017)