From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sheffield

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Jun 2, 2022
No. 03-22-00197-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 2, 2022)

Opinion

03-22-00197-CV

06-02-2022

In re Marcus Tyler Sheffield


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Gisela D. Triana, Justice

We withdraw the opinion dated April 20, 2022, substitute the following opinion in its place, and deny relator's motion for rehearing.

Relator Marcus Tyler Sheffield has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining that the trial court has failed to rule on his renewed petition for expunction. To obtain mandamus relief for a failure to rule, Relator must establish that (1) the petition was properly filed and has been pending for a reasonable time; (2) the relator requested a ruling; and (3) the trial court refused to rule. In re Sarkissian, 243 S.W.3d 860, 861 (Tex. App.-Waco 2008, orig. proceeding). Having reviewed the petition and the record provided, Relator has failed to establish that his petition was properly filed. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 14.006(a), (b)(1) (authorizing courts to order inmates who have filed a claim to pay court fees and costs), § 14.011(a) (prohibiting the clerk from accepting filings of another claim by the inmate until the outstanding fees and costs are paid). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).


Summaries of

In re Sheffield

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Jun 2, 2022
No. 03-22-00197-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 2, 2022)
Case details for

In re Sheffield

Case Details

Full title:In re Marcus Tyler Sheffield

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Jun 2, 2022

Citations

No. 03-22-00197-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 2, 2022)