From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sheffield

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Apr 20, 2022
No. 03-22-00197-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 20, 2022)

Opinion

03-22-00197-CV

04-20-2022

In re Marcus Tyler Sheffield


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GISELA D. TRIANA, JUSTICE

Relator Marcus Tyler Sheffield has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining that the trial court has failed to rule on a petition for expunction. Sheffield bears the burden to present this Court with a record (including but not limited to the expunction petition) sufficient to demonstrate his right to mandamus relief. See In re Sarkissian, 243 S.W.3d 860, 861 (Tex. App.-Waco 2008, orig. proceeding) (explaining that relator must establish the trial court has a duty to rule and that the filing was called to the court's attention); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a) (requiring a relator to file a record containing sworn copies "of every document that is material to [his] claim for relief"). Having reviewed the mandamus petition and the record provided, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).


Summaries of

In re Sheffield

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Apr 20, 2022
No. 03-22-00197-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 20, 2022)
Case details for

In re Sheffield

Case Details

Full title:In re Marcus Tyler Sheffield

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Apr 20, 2022

Citations

No. 03-22-00197-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 20, 2022)