From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sheehan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 8, 2010
72 A.D.3d 1270 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. (Attorney Registration No. 3039476).

April 8, 2010.

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Michael K. Creaser of counsel), for petitioner.

Before: Peters, J.P., Spain, Rose, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.


Respondent is a resident of Connecticut and was admitted to practice there in 1999. He was admitted to practice by this Court in 2000.


By order of the Superior Court of Connecticut dated November 5, 2009, respondent was placed on interim suspension until further order of the court. Respondent admitted in the Connecticut proceeding that he engaged in a conflict of interest and failed to obtain informed consent in writing with respect to his representation of the seller, the buyer, and the lender in the closing of the sale of complainant's property, and that such conduct violated Rules of Professional Conduct ( 22 NYCRR 1200.0) rule 1.7 (b) (4).

As a result of the discipline imposed upon respondent in Connecticut, petitioner moves for an order disciplining him pursuant to this Court's rules ( see 22 NYCRR 806.19). Respondent has failed to answer or otherwise appear on this motion. We therefore grant the motion and further conclude that respondent should be suspended from the practice of law until further order of this Court.

Ordered that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court; and it is further ordered that, for the period of suspension, respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and respondent is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further ordered that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court's rules regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys ( see 22 NYCRR 806.9).


Summaries of

In re Sheehan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 8, 2010
72 A.D.3d 1270 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Sheehan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DOUGLAS D. SHEEHAN, an Attorney, Respondent. COMMITTEE ON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 8, 2010

Citations

72 A.D.3d 1270 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
897 N.Y.S.2d 916

Citing Cases

In re Sheehan

He was admitted to the practice of law by this Court in 2000. Following respondent's indefinite interim…

In re Colby

Noting respondent's discipline in New Jersey for failing to cooperate with a disciplinary investigation along…