From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Shea

Supreme Court of Alaska
May 18, 2011
251 P.3d 357 (Alaska 2011)

Opinion

No. S-14014.

May 18, 2011.

Before: CARPENETI, Chief Justice, and FABE, WINFREE and STOWERS, Justices.


Order

The Disciplinary Board of the Alaska Bar Association, based on its adoption of an area hearing committee's findings of fact and conclusions of law and a final report of recommended sanctions, recommended that attorney Wevley William Shea be suspended from the practice of law for 25 months and be subject to certain conditions for reinstatement. Shea appealed that recommendation.

We review disciplinary recommendations under Alaska Bar Rule 22(r). We independently review the record, but give great weight to the Disciplinary Board's findings of fact. We apply our independent judgment to questions of law and the appropriateness of sanctions, "guided but not constrained by the American Bar Association's Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions and by the sanctions imposed in comparable disciplinary proceedings."

Alaska Bar Rule 22(r) (stating that this court "will review findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations of discipline made by the [Disciplinary] Board").

In re Cyrus, 241 P.3d 890, 892 (Alaska 2010).

Id.

Id. at 893-94 (quoting In re Friedman, 23 P.3d 620, 625 (Alaska 2001)) (internal quotation marks omitted).

The Area Hearing Committee, and, by adoption, the Disciplinary Board, found by clear and convincing evidence that Shea violated Alaska Rules of Professional Conduct 1.9(a) (conflict of interest), 3.1 and 3.3 (false statements of fact in court pleadings), and 4.4 (unprofessional pleadings). After reviewing the record and giving due weight to the relevant findings of fact, we agree those violations were proved by clear and convincing evidence.

The Area Hearing Committee, and, by adoption, the Disciplinary Board, recommended, in relevant part, that: (1) Shea be suspended from the practice of law in Alaska for 25 months; (2) prior to reinstatement, Shea be required to comply with Bar Rule 29(c)(1); and (3) prior to applying for rein-statement, Shea be required to demonstrate that he has "the character and fitness to practice law by meeting the . . . requirements of Alaska Bar Rule 2, Sec[tion] 1(d)," and "via evidence from a psychiatrist or psychologist, that [he] is mentally fit to return to the practice of law." Applying our independent judgment to the appropriateness of this sanction, we adopt the recommended discipline.

Alaska Bar Rule 29(c)(1) provides that an attorney suspended for more than two years must petition for reinstatement and demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that the petitioner "has the moral qualifications, competency, and knowledge of law required for admission" and that his "resumption of the practice . . . will not be detrimental to the integrity and standing of the Bar, or to the administration of justice, or subversive of the public interest."

Alaska Bar Rule 2, Section 1(d) sets out "character and fitness" standards for application to membership in the Bar.

IT IS ORDERED that Wevley William Shea is suspended from the practice of law in Alaska for 25 months effective June 17, 2011, subject to the stated conditions for reinstatement.

An opinion will follow.

Entered at the direction of the court.

CHRISTEN, Justice, not participating.


Summaries of

In re Shea

Supreme Court of Alaska
May 18, 2011
251 P.3d 357 (Alaska 2011)
Case details for

In re Shea

Case Details

Full title:In the Disciplinary Matter Involving Wevley William SHEA, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Alaska

Date published: May 18, 2011

Citations

251 P.3d 357 (Alaska 2011)

Citing Cases

In re Shea

3. In re Shea, 251 P.3d 357, 358 (Alaska 2011) (footnotes omitted). We heard oral argument on May 17,…

In re Chaobal

Chaobal and Bar Counsel have considered the following reported and unreported cases in which professional…