From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sharp

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 29, 1999
722 A.2d 930 (N.J. 1999)

Opinion

January 29, 1999.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on October 23, 1998, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that CYNTHIA LOU SHARP, who formerly practiced law as CYNTHIA S. JENKINS, of HADDON HEIGHTS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 7.1(a)(1) (making false or misleading communications about lawyer's services);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that for a period of two years respondent should be required to submit to the Supreme Court Committee on Attorney Advertising all proposed advertisements for her practice;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CYNTHIA LOU SHARP is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that for a period of two years respondent shall submit to the Supreme Court Committee on Attorney Advertising all proposed advertisements for her practice, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In re Sharp

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 29, 1999
722 A.2d 930 (N.J. 1999)
Case details for

In re Sharp

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF CYNTHIA LOU SHARP, F/K/A CYNTHIA S. JENKINS, AN ATTORNEY…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jan 29, 1999

Citations

722 A.2d 930 (N.J. 1999)
722 A.2d 930

Citing Cases

In re Hyderally

The OAE cites cases in which attorneys were disciplined pursuant to RPC 7.1 because of misleading…