Opinion
23-1358
04-26-2023
In re: SIDDHANTH SHARMA, Petitioner.
Siddhanth Sharma, Petitioner Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: April 24, 2023
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. (5:22-cv-00059-BO)
Siddhanth Sharma, Petitioner Pro Se.
Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Siddhanth Sharma petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We deny Sharma's motion for assignment to a single circuit judge and to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.