Opinion
No. 20-1798
03-08-2021
In re: EMMANUEL EDWARD SEWELL, Petitioner.
Emmanuel Edward Sewell, Petitioner Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (8:18-cv-03439-DKC) Before DIAZ, FLOYD, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Emmanuel Edward Sewell, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Emmanuel Edward Sewell petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his post-judgment motion filed in his civil case. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court has denied Sewell's motion. Accordingly, because the district court has acted in Sewell's case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We deny the pending motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED