From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Severin

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Feb 24, 1922
56 Cal.App. 637 (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)

Opinion

Crim. No. 1043.

February 24, 1922.

APPLICATION for a writ of Habeas Corpus. Denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Marcel E. Cerf, C. H. Sooy and Edwin V. McKenzie for Petitioner.

Leo R. Friedman, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent.


[1] After an examination of the entire record we are satisfied that the corpus delicti has been sufficiently established by circumstantial evidence to permit the admission in evidence of the extrajudicial statements and admissions of the petitioner.

The application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.


Summaries of

In re Severin

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Feb 24, 1922
56 Cal.App. 637 (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
Case details for

In re Severin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of GUSTAVE SEVERIN for a Writ of Habeas…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two

Date published: Feb 24, 1922

Citations

56 Cal.App. 637 (Cal. Ct. App. 1922)
205 P. 101