In re September 11 Litigation

4 Citing cases

  1. In re September 11 Litigation

    600 F. Supp. 2d 549 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)   Cited 4 times

    Rather than the normal manner of rulings by district courts on discovery disputes, discovery disputes with the TSA required administrative procedures leading to final determinations and judicial review by the Courts of Appeals. See Memorandum and Order Regulating Deposition Protocol and Supplementing Orders of March 31 and May 5, 2006, 431 F.Supp.2d 405 (S.D.N.Y. 2006). Then, the discovery proceedings relating to TSA and SSI disputes portended longer than anticipated delays, even for complex lawsuits.

  2. In re September 11 Litigation

    567 F. Supp. 2d 611 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)   Cited 7 times
    Vacating four settlements and fees

    And for the cases that remained, the discovery issues were formidable. The procedure by which discovery had to be filtered through the TSA for SSI was slow and cumbersome; there were continuing controversies how depositions potentially involving SSI would be conducted, and how many, and which, lawyers could attend and what should be their roles. See Memorandum and Order Regulating Deposition Protocol and Supplementing Orders of March 31 and May 5, 2006, 431 F. Supp. 2d 405 (S.D.N.Y. May 16, 2006). Disputes, if SSI issues could not be resolved by negotiation, were to be litigated by appeals to the United States Courts of Appeals.

  3. Cerqueira v. American Airlines, Inc.

    484 F. Supp. 2d 232 (D. Mass. 2007)   Cited 3 times

    In addition, this is not a case where the governing agency advised the Court that more time was required to balance security issues with proper discovery disclosure. See In re September 11 Litigation, 431 F. Supp. 2d 405, 408 (S.D.N.Y. 2006).

  4. Opinion No. 2011-048

    Opinion No. 2011-048 (Ops.Ark.Atty.Gen. Apr. 6, 2011)

    ] See 49 C.F.R. ยง 1520.5(b).In re September 11 Litigation, 431 F. Supp.2d 405 (S.D.N.Y. 2006). Among the sixteen categories is the following: