From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sepeda

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Mar 18, 2020
NO. 03-19-00616-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 18, 2020)

Opinion

NO. 03-19-00616-CV

03-18-2020

In re Jimmy Ray Sepeda and Hortencia Sepeda


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BASTROP COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators Jimmy Ray and Hortencia Sepeda, appearing pro se, seek a writ of mandamus ordering a Bastrop County district court to withdraw a writ of possession and to "restore the Sepedas to the possession" of certain property sold by the Bastrop County Sheriff in July of 2019. Based on the record before us, we deny the requested relief. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (explaining relator has burden to provide court with record sufficient to establish right to mandamus relief); Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(h) (requiring appropriate citations to authorities and the record), 52.7(a)(1) (requiring "a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator's claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding").

We hold pro se litigants to the same standard as those represented by counsel. United Copper Indus., Inc. v. Grissom, 17 S.W.3d 797, 805 n.6 (Tex. App.—Austin 2000, pet. dism'd).

/s/_________

Edward Smith, Justice Before Justices Goodwin, Kelly, and Smith Filed: March 18, 2020


Summaries of

In re Sepeda

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Mar 18, 2020
NO. 03-19-00616-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 18, 2020)
Case details for

In re Sepeda

Case Details

Full title:In re Jimmy Ray Sepeda and Hortencia Sepeda

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Mar 18, 2020

Citations

NO. 03-19-00616-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 18, 2020)