From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Seguin

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Jul 23, 2015
120 A.3d 87 (D.C. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15–BG–457.

07-23-2015

In re Robert SEGUIN, Respondent.


ORDER

On consideration of the certified order disbarring respondent from the practice of law in the state of New Jersey by consent, this court's May 27, 2015, order directing respondent to show cause he should not be disbarred as reciprocal discipline, and the statement of Bar Counsel, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this court's order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Robert Seguin is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010) ; In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of respondent's disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files a D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit.


Summaries of

In re Seguin

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Jul 23, 2015
120 A.3d 87 (D.C. 2015)
Case details for

In re Seguin

Case Details

Full title:In re Robert SEGUIN, Respondent.

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Date published: Jul 23, 2015

Citations

120 A.3d 87 (D.C. 2015)