From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Seay

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Mar 4, 2014
NO. 01-13-00854-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 4, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 01-13-00854-CR

03-04-2014

IN RE ALONZO A. SEAY, JR., Relator


Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Alonzo A. Seay, Jr., an inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining that respondent, an assistant United States Attorney, refuses to respond to a criminal complaint in which relator alleges violations of the Texas Penal Code. Relator requests issuance of a writ of mandamus to compel respondent to respond and to prosecute the criminal complaint.

The petition identifies the respondent as Jose Angel Moreno, an assistant United States Attorney. Relator's certificate of service does not show that he served respondent with a copy of the petition. The petition, therefore, does not meet the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure because it does not certify that a copy was served on respondent. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5, 52.7(c).

This Court does not have jurisdiction to grant relator's requested relief against respondent. By statute, we have the authority only to issue a writ of mandamus against a district court judge or county court judge in this Court's district, and we may issue all writs as necessary to enforce this Court's appellate jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a)-(b) (West 2004).

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

In re Seay

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Mar 4, 2014
NO. 01-13-00854-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 4, 2014)
Case details for

In re Seay

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ALONZO A. SEAY, JR., Relator

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Mar 4, 2014

Citations

NO. 01-13-00854-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 4, 2014)

Citing Cases

In re Luevano

We do not have mandamus jurisdiction against a judge outside of our district unless necessary to enforce our…