From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sean M.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 27, 2017
151 A.D.3d 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

06-27-2017

In re SEAN M., A Child Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Yanny M., Respondent–Appellant, Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner. Giskan Solotaroff & Anderson LLP, Her Justice, Immigrant Defense Project, Lansner and Kubitschek, Legal Services, NYC, MFY Legal Services, My Sister's Place, New York Civil Liberties Union, New York State Defenders Association, and National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers & New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amici Curiae. In re Tameya H., and Another, Children Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Justine D., Respondent–Appellant, Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner. Giskan Solotaroff & Anderson LLP, Her Justice, Immigrant Defense Project, Lansner and Kubitschek, Legal Services, NYC, MFY Legal Services, My Sister's Place, New York Civil Liberties Union, New York State Defenders Association, and National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers & New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amici Curiae.

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, New York (David Elbaum of counsel), and The Bronx Defenders, Bronx (Saul Zipkin of counsel), for appellant. Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (John A. Newbery of counsel), attorney for the children. Davida McGhee, New York, for Giskan Solotaroff & Anderson LLP, Her Justice, Immigrant Defense Project, Lansner and Kubitschek, Legal Services, NYC, MFY Legal Services, and My Sister's Place, amici curiae. New York Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York (Robert Hodgson of counsel), for New York Civil Liberties Union, amicus curiae. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York (Matthew L. Conrad of counsel), for New York State Defenders Association, amicus curiae. Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, New York (Barry A. Bohrer of counsel), for National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers & New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, amici curiae.


Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, New York (David Elbaum of counsel), and The Bronx Defenders, Bronx (Saul Zipkin of counsel), for appellant.

Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (John A. Newbery of counsel), attorney for the children.

Davida McGhee, New York, for Giskan Solotaroff & Anderson LLP, Her Justice, Immigrant Defense Project, Lansner and Kubitschek, Legal Services, NYC, MFY Legal Services, and My Sister's Place, amici curiae.

New York Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York (Robert Hodgson of counsel), for New York Civil Liberties Union, amicus curiae.

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York (Matthew L. Conrad of counsel), for New York State Defenders Association, amicus curiae.

Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, New York (Barry A. Bohrer of counsel), for National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers & New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, amici curiae.

FRIEDMAN, J.P., WEBBER, GESMER, KERN, JJ.

Order (denominated a decision), Family Court, Bronx County (Alma M. Gomez, J.), entered on or about October 3, 2016, and order (denominated a decision), same court (Michael R. Milsap, J.), entered on or about July 22, 2016, which denied the respective motions of mothers Yanny M. and Justine D. for clarification as to whether each could share with her defense counsel in her respective, related criminal proceeding, Administration for Children's Services progress notes received in discovery in her respective neglect proceeding, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, to clarify that each may share the progress notes with her criminal defense counsel.

The courts' decisions affected the rights of the mothers to consult with fully informed criminal defense counsel and the mothers were aggrieved by the limitations the court placed on their ability to share information with their respective counsel.

The restrictions noted in Social Services Law § 422(4)(A) did not bar them from providing to their criminal defense counsel ACS records lawfully obtained in their neglect proceedings. Any other result would violate their First and Sixth Amendment rights (see People v. Knowles, 88 N.Y.2d 763, 766, 650 N.Y.S.2d 617, 673 N.E.2d 902 [1996] ).


Summaries of

In re Sean M.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 27, 2017
151 A.D.3d 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

In re Sean M.

Case Details

Full title:In re SEAN M., A Child Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Yanny M.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 27, 2017

Citations

151 A.D.3d 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
151 A.D.3d 636

Citing Cases

Manuel H. v. Admin. for Children's Servs. of N.Y. (In re Kaeyden H.)

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Michael R. Milsap, J.), entered on or about June 21, 2018, which, to the…

In re Kaden J.M.

The appellant has elected to take an appeal from the February 1, 2016, intake order, rather than to seek…