From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Scott

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Aug 10, 2022
No. 09-22-00233-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 10, 2022)

Opinion

09-22-00233-CR

08-10-2022

IN RE FABBIAN DONTA SCOTT


Do Not Publish

Submitted on August 9, 2022

Original Proceeding Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. 21-36748 and 21-36749

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

In a petition for a writ of mandamus, Fabbian Donta Scott seeks an order compelling the trial court to rule on motions that Scott filed pro se in two criminal cases. According to the information provided by Scott in the mandamus petition, Scott is represented by counsel in the trial court. "A defendant has no right to hybrid representation, and, as a consequence, a trial court is free to disregard any pro se motions presented by a defendant who is represented by counsel." Jenkins v. State, 592 S.W.3d 894, 902 n. 47 (Tex. Crim. App. 2018). Scott failed to establish that the trial court abused its discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus.

PETITION DENIED.


Summaries of

In re Scott

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Aug 10, 2022
No. 09-22-00233-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 10, 2022)
Case details for

In re Scott

Case Details

Full title:IN RE FABBIAN DONTA SCOTT

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Aug 10, 2022

Citations

No. 09-22-00233-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 10, 2022)