Opinion
No. 15492
Opinion Filed December 20, 1932. Rehearing Denied January 7, 1933.
(Syllabus.)
Attorney and Client — Disbarment of Attorney — Appeal — Reinstatement Upon Petition for Rehearing.
Where an order of disbarment has been made and upon review thereof on the petition for rehearing it appears that the respondent should not now be disbarred, the order of disbarment theretofore made will be vacated and the respondent will be reinstated.
Disbarment proceedings by Thomas P. Holt and the Bar Commission of Oklahoma against W.F. Schulte. Order of disbarment vacated, and respondent reinstated.
Lydick, McPherren Wilson and M.E. Jordan, for complainants.
W.F. Schulte and E.N. Jones, for respondent.
Upon a review of the record in this case, we are of the opinion that the order of disbarment heretofore made in this case should be vacated, set aside, and held for naught; that the prayer of the complainants for the disbarment of the respondent should be denied, and that the respondent should be reinstated.
It is so ordered.
LESTER, C. J., and RILEY, HEFNER, CULLISON, SWINDALL, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, V. C. J., not voting.
Note. — See under (1) 2 R. C. L. 1113.